Māori Rangatiratanga

2023-02-22 Sliding into racial division

Racial division in "Aotearoa" (New Zealand) is becoming more acrimonious by the day. Here Rawiri Waititi (co leader of the Māori Party) is celebrating the murder and eating of explorer captain cook.

I really don't see how he can blame explorer James Cook for "colonisation".

It's not just those who identify as Māori who are inciting racial hatred. Here is a self proclaimed "brown girl" poet, of Samoan and European descent using her "art" to instill hatred against white people, even though I think she looks rather white herself.

"Color" being their assumed gender, these niggers remind me of Rachel Dolezaal (click the wiki tab to learn about her transracial delusion). Their Māoriness is fake.

Look at Debbie's mom... she must be so disadvantaged raised in oppressed Māori culture? NOT! There are endless grants going to anyone who claims a whiff of Māori blood, also read about Sir Tipene O'Regan, such a fine Māori family name /sarcasm for their vocal reparation advocate.
It's a rort.

Māori in Politics

Most Māori people don't make an issue of their race. For instance, the leader of the ACT party, David Seymour, has Māori heritage, but their policies are not harping on endlessly about "indigenous" rights. I suspect he might even be ideologically opposed to the racist schism that we see creeping into government.

However our current Māori Development Minister, Willie Jackson has flamed him as a "Useless Māori" and doubled down on his racist statement saying "He [Seymour] deserves to be attacked, he's attacking the Māori nation". What's this separate Māori nation I wondered straight away?

Here is a trimmed down version of a confrontational parliament performance by Rawiri Waititi, co-leader of the Māori Party. You don't have to look far to see the separatist legal frame work being constructed on the basis of race. Even their cultural practices are now designated "intellectual property" and you will be accused of cultural appropriation if you adopt any of it.

1. The opposition leader discussing He Puapua really isn't making "racist" remarks.
2. The PM's equality of outcome health care ought to look at eating habits, exercise and substance abuse rather than assuming it's systemic racism in the health profession.
3. Rawiri was deliberately disorderly, sabotaging the debate in defiance of Mr speaker's caution.

Co-Governance

The treaty of Waitangi has been reinterpreted to imply a partnership between the crown and the Māori tribes. This co-governance paradigm has been sneeked in step by stealthful step under successive governments, but never presented to the public as an election issue.

It's creating a huge bureaucracy in which nothing can get done without iwi aproval. Here are two videos in which the implications of "co-ownership" of water known as He Puapua is explained. This is just one example of many new race based institutions that will become more significant as we migrate towards a multi-cultural society in which the European heritage and maybe even the English language will lose relevance in Aotearoa.

While 174m gave an intelligent analysis of the new government policy, he subsequently shut his Youtube down, because he has family who would become the target of Māori terror... Here is a Facebook post gloating about it to somone else they are trying to bully into silence. I concealed the person's actual name because it's inappropriate to doxx him like that. I've also removed his avatar from the thumbnails.

Utu Justice

Utu is the Māori principle of reprisal that was the traditional mechanism for "justice" in their culture. Utu can be administered indiscriminately to anyone remotely related to the alleged perpetrator even if they are personally completly innocent. It's a kind of tribal feud system.

Terrorism is the policy of dominating people by fear, usually for political motives. I stumbled on adjacent Tweet recently and while I wasn't involved in the discussion the intention is obvious to me: To intimdate her opponent with threat of reprisal by her relatives. Note: pakeha = non maori person, whakapapa = genealogy, tīpuna = ancestors.

In current year the accusation 'raaacist' has become the go-to censor for anyone who questions the Māori political agenda such as Māori co-governance, even though in reality, doing so is opposing their systemic race-based demands for legal privileges and property. It qualifies as terrorism because the accusation alone likely incites unidentified 3rd parties to acts of vigilante retribution, with a lynch-mob mentality.

Over the last year haters (instigated by the Amanda mentioned at the head of this page), have been baiting trolling and flaming me personally as such, as well as branding me a pedophile and a rapist. You can read more about that on my page about harmful communication, but here are two posts claiming to be targeting me personally int the name of the maori party, an elitist race based political party party who on their own website claim genetic racial superiority.

Using a fake name, they make vile personal attacks on public forums, just because I dared question their politics?

In the past such had resulted in life threateing extortion. The police dismissed it as "civil case" and my lawyer said that when the gangs are involved (royal) we don't get involved. It's complete nonsense. Of course I was afraid, but no way could I carry on handing them money every time they came to my door. Still today the NZ authorities will do fuck-all about them posting allegations like this on Facebook. Are they just going to wait until someone gets killed, leaving me to live in fear and denying me means of self defense?

Dairy shop keepers started a campaign against the rise in ram raids and roberies after a shop keeper was stabbed to death. A girl showed a hockey stick she would use to defend herself, but the police promptly threatened one could end up on a charge if any of the raiders were harmed. Typical of whanau mentality someone chimed in to threaten further assaults in prison, thus intimidating victims of crime into silence and inaction! I find their attitude truly barbaric and steeped in misguided racial resentments.

Anyone who dares question their racist Apartheid agenda will be baited, framed and demonized as a "raaacist" and then terrorised into silence with implied vigilante threats. This may be the kind of "Law" we should expect from a primitive stone age culture, but should we be accepting it in our <current year> democracy?

In European cultures, justice requires an independent and objective arbiter: a qualified judge, not an angry mob. Reverting to this "Justice Aotearoa" utu-culture is not going to end well for New Zealand.

Satanists in Parliament?

According to @VeritasRisingNZ's Telegram channel, this is typical selfie of a "wahine maori" who identifies as "Justice Aotearoa". Her cronies go about "consequencing" anyone who questions their racial supremacy agenda.
They are cyber bullies and terrorists. pic.twitter.com/XNOxYXNNKH

— Melahi (@Melahi_Ngaro) July 10, 2022

What a person does in their own home is none of my business, and dressing up can just be for fun, but for a politician to parade what I consider fetish attire with Satanic undertones on her Facebook does raise questions about her aspirations.

Many maori invoke whanau on social media, which I feel is divisive with racial undertones and undermines the fundamental principles of democracy.

On Twitter co-leader of the maori party tweets racial hatred and incites his race to "fight on all fronts". I tried to give a rational reply.

Tribal Law

In a Christmas eve mail shot from NZCPR (not available on their site yet), Muriel Newman writes as follows:

What we have also learnt from 2022 is more about the Prime Minister’s radical socialist agenda. It has become glaringly obvious that her aim is to deliver control of key New Zealand institutions and services to tribal leaders who run multi-million-dollar business development corporations. This is essentially privatisation by stealth, since their goal is not the public good – it is control of New Zealand for their own benefit.

And what we now know, from the extent of the reach of this tribal agenda into virtually every government department, is that what Jacinda Ardern has actually put in place is the co-governance of New Zealand.

This represents a massive betrayal by the Prime Minister, as New Zealanders’ fundamental democratic rights are being eroded by stealth.

None of this was foreshadowed during the 2020 election campaign. Jacinda Ardern did not tell voters she was intending to roll-out a tribal rule agenda. In fact, she had kept the whole thing secret from her Deputy Prime Minister, Winston Peters - even as the groundwork was being prepared under cover of Covid during election year.

While a Cabinet Minute records that the New Zealand First leader had been at the meeting in March 2019 that authorised Minister Nanaia Mahuta to develop an implementation plan for the United Nations Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, once the He Puapua blueprint for tribal rule by 2040 had been delivered, its initial enactment appears to have been a covert affair.

It was only after gaining an absolute majority at the 2020 election, that the roll-out began in earnest and at such a pace that it became obvious that co-governance was in play.

It was well orchestrated: to remove a potential obstacle, the $55 million Public Interest Journalism Fund was established in early 2020, which had as a core requirement that recipients must promote the Treaty “partnership” fabrication upon which co-governance is based.

The mainstream media were in effect paid off to buy into He Puapua.

Even now, the guidelines for the final round of PIJF funding shows their focus is still on ensuring Maori journalism influences editorial decisions: “Priority will be given to applicants who show… the impact it will have on editorial decision making...”

From the time we first discovered He Puapua just after the 2020 election and revealed it through our newsletters, we have been uncovering how this unmandated agenda is being embedded into our legislative and regulatory framework.

In health, the reforms were aimed at centralising our community-based District Health Board system to not only enable the establishment of a separate system for Maori, but to give the tribal elite the power of veto.

This is now manifesting itself in the emergence of an apartheid health system that prioritises patients on the basis of race instead of clinical need. Using the bogus goal of delivering “equity”, if you are Maori you will now be given priority over other New Zealanders with greater need.

Jacinda Ardern’s administration is responsible for deeply dividing New Zealand society as Kiwis are increasingly being segregated on the basis of race: those who are Maori elevated into a privileged ruling class, while everyone else is relegated to second-class status.

This has become very obvious in the battle for water.

Three Waters has now been expanded to five waters, with coastal and geothermal water added without any consultation at all with the wider community after submissions had closed. Not only was there no Cabinet sign-off to this massive expansion in the scope of the Bill, neither the Prime Minister nor her senior Ministers were aware that the change had taken place.

It therefore seems that co-governance is actually tribal totalitarianism by another name.

Furthermore, Nanaia Mahtua has ensured, through her law change, that iwi will have full control of water in New Zealand: from the all-powerful Maori advisory group to the water regulator chaired by her sister, to the co-governed regional representative groups with veto control over the four new water services entities, to iwi having the power to dictate what happens in their local area – it is all tied up. It is therefore highly likely that it will only be a matter of time before water royalties for Maori, in perpetuity, are introduced.

In reflecting on gross government incompetence and failure this year, two areas stand out. One is immigration, where too few migrant workers have been allowed into the country, leading to widespread business failure as a result of the worker shortage crisis. And the other is crime.

With iwi leaders opposed to increasing immigration, is the present workplace catastrophe yet another example of co-governance failure?

And since He Puapua has the goal of replacing prison for Maori with wrap-around services - as well as creating a separate tikanga-based justice system (similar to the new Maori health system) - are we now experiencing the consequences?

Is the dramatic reduction in the prison population over the last two years, whereby criminals who would previously have been locked up to keep people safe are now back out on the streets, yet another disastrous example of co-governance in action?

Jacinda Ardern has already signalled she is planning an overhaul of local government. With a co-governance model to give iwi control of all of the functions of local government including rates the most likely outcome of her reforms, shouldn’t property owners be concerned?

In brief: By 2040 we will be under tribal law, administered by unelected hereditary iwi chiefs.
It's Feudalism at best!. I shall just finish with condensed views on Iwi by Kelvyn Alp of from Counterspin