The Resistance

2023-08-09 Case Resurfaces

Unexpectedly my orgnal HDCA case resurfaces, but I don't want to give the game away (yet) as it might prejudice my case, so instead let's have this little interlude:

hypocrisy & phony victimhood

Loony left attention whore, Byron C. Clark, had been proclaiming himself an expert of far right supremacist activism in Aotearoa and as such he had been slandering and defaming Lee Williams on both MSM and on social media. He declined every polite request Lee made to meet up and discus it face to face.

The prolific defammation culminated in a petition orchestrated by co-leader of the Māori Party to get Lee sacked from his day job. Eventually Lee went to visit Byron at his place of work. Lee was perfectly polite but Byron made a big issue of it and got a court injunction against Lee even mentioning him online. The context of Byron's provocation was never taken into account and indeed Byron merrily persevered abusing various media to slag Lee off without ever giving him a right of reply.

Click the tab to see a video he uploaded recently. Worth knowing is that the police released Lee because he was victim of the assault, not the perpetrator, but Byron doesn't care about the truth. He just wants to cancel people that hold different opinions. Scroll down to the comments to see me accuse him of hypocrisy!

• Why is this ignorant Marxist troll being hailed as expert?
• Why is he allowed to carry on slandering people with impunity?
• How did he qualify for a free lawyer, and protection when HE is the trouble maker?
• Who will compensate his victims of slander for the repercussions?

Someone did try to sue Radio New Zealand for slander on Lee's behalf, but the case was declined based on the decision by Lee's employer. I do think they should disclose exactly what was considered and whether an employer's opinion has jurisdiction. Surely Sinlait, under threat from radical racist politics are no substitute for justice?

2023-05-22 Community Law insinuates racism

As described below, the online slander persisted and I had found out who was behind some of it. Once again I went through the procedures of getting Netsafe to agree it was sufficiently harmful to be presented to court under the Harmful Communications Act.

Since my previous attempt had gone awry, this time I asked Community Law for advice. They didn't respond for ages and eventually declined. They alleged some of my responses to the relentless taunting and baiting, insinuated racism, but were unwilling to identify such. In fact my case was nothing to do with race. It was about impersonation, accusations, defammation and slander, that were inciting real life hate crimes against me. Due to the delay they also said I would now have to go get fresh evidence and run the Netsafe gauntlet once again. They advised I then hire one of the expensive lawyers they listed.

The New Zealand Law Society has been proposing to enshrine "Treaty principles" in all legal practice, but their interpreation of said Waitangi treaty is one that would impose racial division and tribal law (tikanga). Canterbury Law are a charity and I wouldn't be surprised if among their benefactors are wealthy Iwi (tribal) overlords. All I had done was question the He Puapua document that Labour government sneaked in by stealth. Doing so was now being branded 'raaacism'. Surely the actul racism is in the proposed race based "co-governance"?

Below for instance is a troll post by a member of the Māori Party. It is berating me for having discussed with the other people they mentioned. Open the gallery of troll posts to see him dead naming me, which testifies to interference in my private life. He also confirms he has been stalking me and alludes to the corrupt high ranking masonic lawyer, Simon Stammer-Smith, a personal friend of my Freemason brother, Marc Servaas Scaife, who embezzeled estate assets and conspired to cheat me out of a significant share of inheritance. That's got nothing to do with the Māori Party, so why is it cropping up here? Could it be all part of the same sinister secret society: Corruption, collusion and dirty politics for a greedy grabbing spree at the top: A festering can of masonic worms.

The racism allegation from creepy "caseworker 4" at Canterbury law had originated with these online trolls accusing and baiting. It is the same false pretext the trolls abused for "consequencing" wrong think of any who dared question the sinister coup d'état by Iwi parasites.

Pretending to be concened citizens, the Christchurch hate mob manipulated authories to persecute me based on false accusations that they just took at face value. The hate crimes, they instigated to consequence me for wrong think were getting too much for me. Some friends talked me into selling up and moving to the West Coast, but the cowardly hate mob were not satisfied with running me out of town. It wasn't long before they tracked me down. shall write about what transpired there on a separate page.

2022-09-09 Dog Pound

Recovering from surgery Fuego had not yet learned to come when I call, so I had hitched him to the tow bar while I walked back to get the other 3 dogs who were still running free in the red zone at South Shore. It was a walk I did with them most days.

Getting back to the car, Fuego was gone. I could see him nowhere. I called in vain. With the other 3 dogs on leads it wasn't practical to go looking so I took them home then came straight back. I spent many hours calling his name and searching until it got dark. None of the people I asked had seen him. I came back the next day and walked our usual route calling, but again in vain.

Accused by the Facebook hate mob of "selling dogs" and using a fake name, I had been booted of Facebook once again. I did post on Twitter that he was missing.

Fuego's lead came undone and he ran off today at Tern street, South Brighton. I've been unable to find him.
If anyone sees him he's probably hungry and lost. Please help him! pic.twitter.com/4ZOckUFmXv

— Melahi (@Melahi_Ngaro) September 9, 2022

A local resident offered to advertize his missing on their community Facebook page. This text message from her confirms it, but we got no reply. One of the hate mob, OTOH alleges they had posted there that the dog had been found and then he blamed me for not having checked. Said group is not open to the public while his gang had got my "happy puppy blog" and Facebook account deleted by alleging I were selling dogs and using a fake name.

A few days later Fuego was listed on the dog pound Facebook page and there were comments from the hate mob, showing they did know whose dog it was and even doxxing my home address. They alleged animal abuse and made threats of violence. They were still gloating come Christmas, months later.

Now I can't prove anyone deliberately took my dog, but among the lies on the dog pound site was the distortion I would have been towing my Fuego behind my car. Note: The actual reason I didn't leave him in the car unattended was to prevent him from chewing the controls again.

This hate mob interfere with malice in people's private affairs just to stir up trouble, then they abuse authorities with vindictive glee. They are like playground bullies a CCP/Nazi style social credit snitch army while pretending to be concerned citizens. City council wanted hundreds of dollars in fines and fees from me. They demanded I get a dog license for Fuego, but wouldn't let me have 3 dogs, so there was no way I could comply. I told them they could find him a new home themselves then and they said they would make me pay anyway.

2022-07-10 Stochastic Terrorism

It's a term that the woke left invented as they cry foul when somone confronts them with their underhand cowardly gutter-sniping and relentless persecution. As experienced for years now, people do become targets of random vigilante actions from unidentified 3rd parties due to the malicious doxxing, gossip and slander published online and so it was that once again, last night I was targeted. I got out of bed and photographed the evidence then posted it on Twitter.

0:30am - I wake to my dogs barking.
Peered thru the window to see an 'N-word' trying to rip the lid off my letter box. 'stochastic terrorism' that the leftists provoke by publishing hate speech, slander and doxxing.
They ran off before I could grab my cross bow pic.twitter.com/KQg7Gu5gWG

— Melahi (@Melahi_Ngaro) July 9, 2022

One of the Facebook hate mob distorts it as 'raaacism' which is precisely why these vandals started doing it in the first place. Day after day, year after year this scum slander me, bait, antagonise, denigrate, taunt, provoke and accuse me of all sorts of vile perversions. They enjoy causing emotional, physical and financial harm while the police and the justices are worse than useless, leaving me living in fear day and night.

This nigga was sneaking around under cloak of darkness to damage my property and intimidate. It's not his race, nor his skin color, but his behaviour and cowardice that earns him my utter contempt. Ultimately the ones I blame are woketard leftists for shit stirring and I have no choice, but to threaten self defense when it's their choice to come here with intent to do me harm.

2022-06-27 A seething hater

I was right about it being Amanda Rowe who had incited cancel-culture woketards to attack me online (see them conspiring on Facebook below). She's the one who turned up in the hospital to gloat at me when the doctors had given up. They thought I was on my death bed and had put an NFR label on my wrist. That's the kind of hateful cunt Amanda is. Her details are publicly available from white pages, so posting it is not doxxing.

Stuart Duncan, OTOH lurks behind countless fake online identities and remained illusive until I requested a copy of the originating complaint that he bragged about making to Christchurch Animal Control. They did conceal his name, but slipped up on his address. On Stuart's second complaint they redacted that too, but the cat was out of the bag by then. Stuart confirmed it was him with his posts on reddit asking for legal advice how to sue city council for exposing him all while putting my life at risk with his slander and doxxing, that the law would do nothing about.

Stuart's address is highly relevant because it reveals that Stuart cannot possibly have suffered any alleged "dog nuisance" from my Lucy. City Council redacting it as well as hiding other antagonistic remarks, show they were aware of their complicity in my malevolent persecution. They should also have realized it was the same unreliable witness each time. All the while Stuart continued baiting, taunting, harassing, threatening and bullying me with fake online identities. I had hoped to have a frank discussion about what was going on, because I was unaware of their dog leash bylaw when I made that video, but City Council got on their high horse and slapped me with crippling infringement fees, while ignoring my reply. The authorities had given me the run around, rejecting my request for a hearing on grounds of technicalities but added court costs anyway, so that's why I made the second Lucy video and we shall do it with a hearing this time.

Stuart had no qualms abusing my details to slander, threaten and harass me for over a year already and Netsafe had advised I take it to court under the harmful communications act. That seems to have floundered on unmasking his fake accounts.

Meanwhile Stuart guffawed in glee behind his keyboard at all the distress he was causing, to a vulnerable elderly and isolated person. Some of his posts had shown he was trying to drive me to suicide. I saw no reason not to reciprocate. On twitter he goes by names @BeadyPig, @Freedum_Crybaby, @Dakman_rules..., so I thought I let Lee Williams know who to block and encourage him to do some doxxing back. Alas that was against Twitter rules. None the less I consider city council using him to agravate, taunt and provoke constitutes entrapment and hence bullying into compliance by raiding the superanuation of an elderly, vulnerable and isolated woman for infringemnent fees is not only disgraceful cowardice but also unlawful.

I can't imagine why the woke tangiweto went blubbering on Reddit about how unfair it all was that I in return should know where HE lives. He was asking for legal help so I told his fans what a hypocrite he was and here are two of his replies that show what an asshole I'm dealing with and confirms he has no intention to ever stop.

Stuart continues to stalk and abuse me on other platforms. Here he is stalking me on Odysee, not even my channel, so I simply deleted my comment - yes that's the cowardly leftist cancel culture in action. It's cyber bullying. It's terrorism to intimidate me for discussing opinions they don't like.

Stuart had also been vomiting his bile at me on Rumble and on Reddit I discovered he was getting advice and hating on me. There he confirmed he's the one who instigated yet more "infringement fees" from City Council, but only an ass-hole could conclude Lucy isn't a very well trained intelligent dog under effective control after watching that video. That is all that the dog control act 1996 itself requires.

I think the problem is petty unelected bureaucrats on a power trip, pedantically imposing unjustifiable bylaw: If a dog is under effective control a dog leash serves no purpose. My Lucy is the kind of dog that will sit outside the dairy while I go in and get my milk. No need to tie her up at all. She won't even chase a cat unless I tell her to.

Video protected by password to prevent abuse by fuckwit trolls and dog control.

2022-05-16 Hive of Shit-stirrers

For about a year now I've been under assiduous attack by cyber trolls with fake identities. They taunt, provoke, bait antagonize and broadcast lies about me on other people's social media. I contacted Netsafe and they advised I take it to court who can have the anonymous trolls unmasked. As discussed elsewhere I've done that, but as yet no conclusion as far as I know.

By pure chance a Google search for something different revealed a Facebook page where a mob of cowardly haters had been congregating to coordinate their underhand assaults on individuals. Their attitude is For holding opinions that we don't like, it's your faulty we are hurting you. - Cyber bullies with lynch mob mentality! There I noticed posts inciting hatred against me personally going back almost a year and it was no surprise that Amanda Rowe (under her maiden-name Amanda Dooley) was the prime instigator. Click the icon to see a gallery of screen shots.

Netsafe determined that there was evidence of harmful communications being perpetrated by Amanda Rowe. My experience has been that correcting her lies with truth, or trying to talk sense to that hateful bitch is counter productive, and so I did ask Netsafe if they could mediate on my behalf. It transpires that said stalker declined to desist from her persecution: A clear statement of intent, for which only coercion now remains to force her to mind her own business.

Netsafe consequently closed the case unresolved and will send me the report I need, so I can innitiate court proceedings (apparently you can't do that under the harmful digital communications act until you have tried resolving it thru Netsafe).

Netsafe agreed it was harmful, yet they respected her right to conceal what allegations she had made about me to them, and so I remain a suspect of undisclosed allegations with no means of defense, despite the fact they have acknowledged these as harmful.

I do have an abundance of evidence accumulated over the years, but not all of it is "digital communications" so not sure how to handle prosecuting Amanda yet. Meanwhile, I shall start by organizing my evidence on a dedicated page which I may, or may not choose to share here in public.

Besides Amanda here is my take on some of the other posts on "The Brutal Truth NZ QWatch" satire page.

1. Facebook terminated my account for "bullying". I had responded to A'Lotta Vageena bragging she had flagged me for breeching Facebook terms somewhere.
2. My attempt to contest the lies they were posting consequently disappeared, as confirmed by A'Lotta (I'm not sure who they were responding to after that, but it wouldn't have been me for obvious reasons). We do learn she had reported me for not using my real name... Am I seriously to assume her name there is genuine? No, this is a hive of vigilante hypocrites, beyond compare!
3. We see some more bullying and threats: Their posts, not mine. I had tried to engage intelligently by telling the actual truth. Alas pointless because they are entrenched in their "brutal" delusions on that page: A mob baying to rip me to shreds with a barrage of lies and misrepresentation.
4. Johnathan Pahaia starts sneering at me and Stuart Duncam seizes the opportunity to project 'raaacism' towards a non white name. Given name, Johnathan, doesn't suggest color to me and a troll is still a troll, by any other name.
5. Stuart calls me a "painted clown" and alleges I've been "dropping N bombs" for years. However I never used to have any reason to dislike those of Māori persuasion and neither have I engaged in racially motivated debates in the past.
6. This hornets nest has been calling me a racist, a rapist and a pedophile all over cyber space for almost a year. Johnathan's screen shot doesn't show what he provoked me with this time, but I had been trying to correct an avalanch of lies from Stuart Duncan. They've been manipulating ethnic communities to behave like a rabid lynch mob. The Māori party, is a racial supremacy cabal if ever there was one and I think they actually want a society rife with racial conflicts.
7. Johnathan concludes with a threat of malware. When they brag about accounts being hacked and impersonations prevail, how can we believe any of their so called evidence?
8. I'm not sure why one of their posts says they need me, but they must be fucking stupid if they still don't understand, I'm not out to get Carl. All I wanted is that he stop broadcasting their slander on his forums, but I document that elsewhere.

I think it's extremely irresponsible that Facebook host this kind of hate mongering targeted at a private individual. It is a cowardly way to intimidate and silence a person from cogent participation in online forums. It smacks of Orwellian thought police and Nazi/CCP social credit snitch society. These are the useful idiots promoting globalist agenda of reducing us to indegent serf class for fruitions by a supremacist financial cabal, a two tier NWO.

2022-04-16 Woke mob rule

Some years back, I was being systematically stalked, harrassed and flagged off social media platforms. At the time, I had come out as transgender and was trying to get advice and have discussions about transitioning, hormones and surgery in forums dedicated to that subject. Invariably I met extreme hostility and was either excluded from joining closed groups, or kicked from them by administrators for no given reason. It turns out that there was an ensconced advocate in the trans community defaming and persecuting me, because they though I was somone else. Eventualy I decided most NZ trans groups and forums are in reality just fetish cross dressing clubs anyway, and so not of any interest to me.

Instead, I would strike up online conversations with other trans people that were beyond the reach of group administrator bans, but invariably that would be derailed by trolls and stalkers with whom reasonable discussion was impossible.

I won't bore you with details here, but by way of example the first is a screen shot of a male radical feminist barging in sneering and then my rational reply was shadow banned. The second was where we were discussing motivation for trans people to have invasive genital surgery (I was wondering how far to go with that myself), but another total stranger hijacks our discussion pontificating how the evil patriarchy inflicts female genital mutilation on children. I had responded that both MGM and FGM should be a choice for the individual once they reach maturity, but that it wasn't the topic of our discussion. Somehow that then triggered more strangers to lambast me for 'raaacism'.

I vaguely remember responding that it was a cultural thing rather than racial, or gender discrimation issue, but it was pointless as our discussion had already been completely derailed.

Let's move on to a video response I made back then to a Youtube by self proclaimed Evil Terf. While many might disagree with my POV, ask yourself if it's fair that my video was flagged off completely, while hers was monetized with a large following of radical bigots. Eventually I did put mine on Vimeo where it hasn't been taken down (yet).